This is a piece I wrote several years ago, and I still feel the same way.  What do you think?

Can Groundhog Day, that little made-up holiday that distracts us from the long haul of winter, become as big as Christmas? Okay, maybe not, but I’m making the case that Groundhog Day , the movie, should become the It’s a Wonderful Life of this generation. I want families to gather round on Groundhog Day and watch this movie together, just like It’s a Wonderful Life has become the Christmas tradition. This movie evokes the same deep feelings, shows the same possibility of transformation through love, only while Frank Capra did it with sincerity and angels, Harold Ramis does it with humor, cynicism and Bill Murray.

It was easy to dismiss this movie when it first came out in 1993 as just another in the long line of silly movies Ramis and Murray had done together (like Caddyshack and Ghostbusters). But the screenplay by Danny Rubin is actually addressing something much deeper. He does it so effectively, and addresses our modern, existential, God-suspicious existence so subtly that some might not even be aware of it. Those out on the spiritual frontlines have noticed though. Ramis says he’s gotten mail from “every known religious organization and discipline, from yogi’s, Hasidic Jews, Jesuits, psychoanaylsts” claiming this movie’s message “perfectly expresses our philosophy.” And the message holds up

No one embodies the modern I’m-smarter-than-you cynic who’s always out for himself better than Bill Murray. And it takes someone with his attitude and comic genius to make this premise work, and help us modern cynics find the meaning of life in our world today, by showing us how to literally live life “one day at a time.” Who would have thought that he would become the Jimmy Stewart of our time?

In It’s a Wonderful Life we got to see how one man’s dreams keep getting postponed but he naturally does good in spite of himself. In a crisis, he feels life is not worth living. He gets his wish. He sees what it would be like if he’d never been born. Only then can he see how many lives he’s touched, how many people he helped, all from his small home town. It never fails to make us cry, because we realize that our ordinary lives are worth living too.

Groundhog Day has a different premise. Here we see one guy who is stuck in what to him is the worst day of his life, putting up with stupid inferior people in a small town. He thinks it’s hoakey, and people who are optimists are stupid too. Phil is mean and cruel in a casually off-hand way, only thinking of himself and how he can get ahead. He’s a weatherman in Pittsburgh, who has to go make the trip to Punxsatawney to do the Groundhog Day footage. He’s mean to his cameraman (Chris Elliot is good as this nondescript, easy-to-overlook guy) and physically attracted but intellectually repelled by his producer, Rita (Andie McDowell, who’s great at playing the sweet optimist). After spending the night in the bed and breakfast (he refuses to stay in the local hotel), he ignores a homeless man and runs from the boring Ned Ryerson from high school who tries to sell him insurance. He goes through the motions of the broadcast, much to the disgust of his crew, but then they are snowed in by the blizzard he didn’t predict. This is the set up.

The next morning, he wakes up and has to relive the same day. It takes him awhile to realize what’s happening. When he wakes up again on the third day and it’s still the same day, he panics, and tries to get help, but no one else is having the same experience. For them it’s a new day. He thinks about all the really good days he’s had in the past. “Why couldn’t I get that day?” he wonders of a day on a tropical island with a beautiful woman. He sits in the coffee shop with two local yokels and asks without irony, “What would you do if you were stuck in one place and every day was exactly the same and nothing you did mattered?” “That about sums it up for me,” one of the yokels replies. This is the situation most people are in today. If every day is the same, what choices do we make, what is our attitude? Are we cynical and smart, not giving money to homeless people, pushing away the obnoxious Ned Ryersons’ of the world, only out for ourselves, mad at God and feeling powerless? This is actually a serious philosophical question. How do you live life one day at a time? The humor and the pathos in this situation come from making it literally one day. Ramos and Rubin explore all sides of it (actually using Elizabeth Kubler-Ross’s five stages of dying as the model).

First Phil realizes (as the yokels point out): no consequences! So he eats all he can, doesn’t floss. Tears the town up, has sex with a pretty girl by telling her everything she wants to hear because there is no tomorrow. But eventually even this gets tiring, and he decides to pursue what he really wants: Rita. But his tricks don’t work with her. After he meticulously plans a “perfect day” for her by finding out all her likes and dislikes, she sees through him. “Is this what love is for you?” she asks as he keeps plying her with more and more of her favorite things. “I could never love someone like you Phil, because you can never love anyone but yourself.” “That’s not true,” he responds. “I don’t even like myself.” He gives in to despair. In his next on camera report he says, “It’s going to be cold, it’s going to be gray, and last you for the rest of your life.” He decides to kill himself by stealing the Groundhog and running the truck over the cliff, then by putting a toaster in his bath, by walking in front of a truck, jumping off a building, and many more. But nothing works. Every morning, like clockwork the numbers turn over to 6 am again on his digital clock radio, he hears Sonny & Cher sing “I Got You Babe” again and the same inane chatter from the DJ’s on the radio.

After his suicides fail, he tries a new approach. He levels with Rita. He proves his story is true because he knows everything that will happen. She thinks it’s a trick. “Maybe the real God uses tricks,” he responds. “Maybe he’s not omnipotent, he’s just been around so long he knows everything.” She finally comes to believe him. They sit on the bed in his room flipping cards into a hat. “Is this what you do with eternity, Phil?” she asks him. She admits she’s always wished for a thousand lifetimes. “Maybe it’s not a curse. Maybe it depends on how you look at it.” He has a flip reply. “Gosh, you’re an upbeat lady,” but she’s struck a chord. As he watches her sleep, he admits to himself that he loves her kindness, how nice she is to people. And that although he doesn’t deserve her, he would like to and he would love her the rest of his life.

The next time the clock flips over, Phil’s attitude changes. He gives money to the homeless man. He brings coffee for his crew and asks their opinion. He finds the homeless man having a heart attack and tries to save him. The next (same) day he plies him with food and stays with him, but he still dies. Then he turns himself to doing good for the living and making more of himself. He reads. He learns to play the piano. He makes a magnificent speech out of his piece. And attracts Rita to him. That night he becomes the man of her dreams from the inside, and he has a revelation. “Whatever happens tomorrow, I’m happy now because I love you.” This is the message of Groundhog Day, just as “No man is a failure who has friends” is the message of It’s a Wonderful Life. He’s learned to live in the moment and be satisfied. And as a result, he gets his reward. The curse is ended, and Rita is his. He is so joyful, he decides he wants to stay in Punxsatawney. His first question to Rita is, “Is there anything I can do for you today?”

{ 0 comments }

Amazon, Publishing, and You

by Leslie on November 14, 2011

From my current Newsletter, November 2011:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Several people have been posting and asking about the recent NY Times article about Amazon working directly with authors and leaving publishers out. What do I think of this, they wonder. I haven’t actually responded yet, because what I think is the result of all my 30-plus years in publishing and a great deal of thought and observation. I couldn’t put it into a quick Facebook note, or a Tweet. I will see if I can unravel some of it for you here.

There are several issues involved, and it’s easy to come away with the wrong impression if you don’t see them all. Let’s start with the obvious one. Do authors need publishers? If you can go directly through Amazon yourself, should you bother with the big, mainstream publishers? This is actually a question I have been putting to the authors I work with for years. And the answer is, it depends. First off, it is true that authors are often neglected by publishers. And it’s not just that they have a hard time getting their editor on the phone or can’t seem to get their own sales figures. I have observed, from my very earliest days in publishing, that there can be an attitude of disdain for the author at the publishing house. I could never understand this, which is why when I started my own publishing company I was careful to be clear that the author is the centerpiece. After all, without authors, there is no publisher. The author is the creative source – the goose, busy laying those golden eggs. So authors’ fear that the publisher doesn’t care about them is often accurate.

Now I will put on my other hat and defend publishers. Authors (and Amanda Hocking is only the most recent example) actually would rather be writing than figuring out what the best price is for their book, or learning which bookstores are worth giving a reading at. When it’s handled properly, the author/publisher relationship can be a beautiful thing. The author is supported in getting their creative work out into the world. And I do believe every author’s work can be bettered by some time with a good editor (although that work is usually handled directly by the author these days).

So what about Amazon then? Is Amazon supporting authors and dis’ing publishers? Should authors abandon their publishers and join them? This is where it gets tricky.

Amazon has been seen by the outside world (that is, those who are not inside publishing) as a “good” company, like Google or Apple, whose products and services are great and who do business in a fair way. Those on the inside have seen something very different. While Amazon is an incredible database and has done a great job of connecting readers and books, they also have exhibited many signs of being a dangerous company. First, they behaved just like the chain stores in undercutting independent bookstores by offering better discounts that were not offered to independents. (This is a long story. A good link to read more is this 1999 article by Bill Petrocelli, co-owner of Book Passage, who was involved from the very beginning with the series of lawsuits pursued by independents. Also, see his Huffington Post blog, for continued, informative weigh-in’s on the publishing industry.)

And then, they have been behaving very aggressively about not collecting sales tax. (This is a flagrant violation of clear and long-standing law in California and most other states with sales taxes.) In its beginnings, Internet commerce sites were given a break to encourage business, but I don’t believe anyone in government intended for this to continue after the larger businesses began putting others out of business. When California began attempting to force Amazon to collect sales tax, they threatened to shut down all their “associates” — the small businesses who get fees from Amazon for connecting consumers to Amazon through links on websites.

Why should this matter to authors? Well, if they behave that way to others, even their ostensible best customers in publishing, you can expect that, one day down the road, they may behave that way with you.

I don’t believe it is ever good for one company to have as much power in an industry as Amazon has today. What to do about it is not something I am even thinking about. I’m just saying it’s worrisome.

Now, despite my uncomfortable feelings, I have gone into business with Amazon. They carry my titles. And I like their transparency with numbers (sales figures and royalties), and ease of access to that. But I think of Amazon as a distribution company, not a publisher.

One final word about the big publishers. I really don’t feel sorry for them. They had no qualms about allowing almost 2,000 independent bookstores to go out of business in the 90s (and another 1500 were gone by 2008), by undercutting their pricing. My view at the time was that they were being incredibly short-sighted in giving all the power to the few people who headed these companies to decide what books would be published. It shouldn’t surprise them that they are now on the receiving end of a similar business strategy.

So where does that leave you? And how can you decide? I think the answer is still the same one I have given authors for years. Think of what would serve you best. Is your book the kind of book that the big New York publishers do well? Is it fiction? If so, try the mainstream route first. Are you an independent self-starter with a lot of opinions about how you want your book to be? Then self-publishing or an Amazon-hybrid of self-publishing may be good for you. The global way to think of it is: who are your readers and how can you best reach them?

{ 0 comments }

The Energy of Completion

August 29, 2011

From my Newsletter, Late Spring 2010 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I have worked on many books. I should say I have worked on many ideas that became manuscripts that became books. I know from all this experience that the closer you get to the end, it seems, the more there is you realize has to be done. This [...]

Read the full article →

E-Books

August 15, 2011

From my Newsletter, Spring 2010 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We had a lively discussion about this at the end of one of my writing classes a few weeks ago and since the subject is coming up in the press frequently I thought I would address it here. First, let’s talk about what an e-book is. There are a [...]

Read the full article →

Going Deep

August 1, 2011

From my End-of-Year Newsletter, 2009 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I want to revisit a topic I brought up back in July (“The Value of Doing Nothing”). It seems even more important and appropriate as we turn into winter, the fallow time of the year. The topic is this: the importance, no -  more than that -  the absolute, [...]

Read the full article →

The Bucket List

July 18, 2011

From my Newsletter, Autumn 2009 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I was talking to my mother on the phone two weeks ago and she said, of going to the new Yankee Stadium, “That’s another thing off my bucket list!” That night, while giving the exercise of writing down ten book ideas to a new class, I thought, hmm, what [...]

Read the full article →

A Little, Easy Thing…

June 30, 2011

From my Newsletter, August 2009 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Because I am now working on this myself, and because it came up in my last Microsoft Word for Writers class, I thought it worth bringing up again how helpful it is to have your files in order on your computer, and to name your different versions correctly so [...]

Read the full article →

The Value of Doing Nothing

June 16, 2011

From my Newsletter, Late Summer 2009 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In our busy-busy; go-go culture, spending time idly, perhaps even staring into space, is not thought well of. In fact, if you went by what people say in the press, you’d think having some alone-time is highly suspect. When reporters couldn’t follow Obama at all times on the [...]

Read the full article →

Writing: Visual or Auditory?

June 2, 2011

From my Newsletter, June 2009 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I had an interesting discussion with a student in a recent class. Someone had made editing suggestions that she wasn’t sure about, and she wanted me to review them. As we went over each suggested change, I realized what was going on. My student tends to write from a [...]

Read the full article →

From First to Second Draft: The Journey Continues…

May 19, 2011

From my Newsletter, Spring 2009 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A student who finished her first draft (yeah!) asked me, How should I approach doing the edit? If you’ve taken my and others’ advice and let yourself just write out the first draft to the end, there are a bunch of things you have to look at in the [...]

Read the full article →